tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13049534.post639827928827473786..comments2011-09-02T12:23:00.388+01:00Comments on broadcastellan: Dunkirk 70 / Roosevelt 69Harry Heuserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06516327808775454066noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13049534.post-29786300001936883132010-05-28T23:15:11.961+01:002010-05-28T23:15:11.961+01:00To be sure, there is something dubious about FDR’s...To be sure, there is something dubious about FDR’s belated insistence, voiced in the same speech, that “Hitler never considered the domination of Europe as an end in itself,” that it was “unmistakably apparent to all of us” that the “Axis powers [could] never achieve their objective of world-domination unless they first obtain[ed] control of the seas, that “to achieve it, they [had to] capture Harry Heuserhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06516327808775454066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13049534.post-73771860733402600412010-05-28T18:18:53.905+01:002010-05-28T18:18:53.905+01:00The more I have read of Roosevelt's attitude t...The more I have read of Roosevelt's attitude toward Britain and the then "European war," the more disappointed I have been. I've always known FDR was the ultimate politician, but it is a known fact that he seemed to ignore both our Ambassador to Britain - Gil Winant and the Lend Lease head Averell Harriman - both of whom pleaded (along with Ed Murrow) for Roosevelt to be more Jimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02565836203120410773noreply@blogger.com